Iran-US Ceasefire Deal: How the World Reacted to Pakistan's Historic Mediation

Countries around the world have welcomed the ceasefire between the United States and Iran, calling it a crucial step toward reducing tensions after weeks of conflict.

United States:

The Donald Trump administration officially agreed to a two‑week ceasefire with Iran on April 7, announcing a suspension of planned attacks on Iranian targets under the condition that Tehran agree to an immediate and safe reopening of the Strait of Hormuz — a key global oil passageway. Trump described the pause as a strategic decision intended to reduce tensions and open space for diplomatic talks, framing it as a diplomatic and security success ahead of broader negotiations, although fundamental disagreements on implementation remain.

Pakistan:

Pakistan has taken a central role in mediating the ceasefire. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif officially requested that Trump extend a ceasefire deadline by two weeks, emphasizing progress in diplomatic efforts while urging Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as a confidence‑building measure. Pakistan’s leadership has engaged in intense shuttle diplomacy between Washington and Tehran, advocating for a negotiated end to hostilities and praising the temporary pause as a chance to build a more lasting peace.

Iran:

Iran’s government response to the ceasefire has been more cautious. While Iranian officials acknowledged receiving the US‑brokered ceasefire proposal through Pakistan, Tehran rejected accepting any proposal under pressure or strict deadlines and reiterated its call for a permanent end to the war rather than a short‑term truce. Iran has insisted on broader conditions for lasting peace, including lifting sanctions and guarantees for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, reflecting a deeper demand for structural conflict resolution rather than temporary pauses.

China:

China has consistently urged restraint and diplomacy throughout the conflict, condemning early US and Israeli strikes on Iran and calling for immediate ceasefire and negotiations. Although Beijing has significant economic and energy interests in the Gulf region, Chinese officials have emphasized dialogue over military escalation and pressed all parties to avoid further destabilizing the Middle East. Chinese calls for ceasefire and political settlement predate the latest truce developments and reflect Beijing’s broader diplomatic posture on the crisis.

Israel:

Israel has supported the US decision to pause attacks on Iranian positions for the agreed two‑week period, but stressed that the truce does not apply to operations in Lebanon, where tensions remain high. Israeli leadership backed the negotiated pause as part of wider efforts to prevent a wider regional conflagration, while also reaffirming its commitment to addressing perceived Iranian threats to its national security.

European Union / Global Voices (Various Countries):

A broad group of nations, including EU member states, welcomed the ceasefire as an opportunity to reduce hostilities and urged full commitment to the two‑week truce. These countries praised the initiative as a chance to restart diplomacy and called for efforts to turn the pause in fighting into lasting peace and stability in the Middle East.

Japan:

Japan said it supports the two‑week ceasefire and views it as a “positive move” toward resolving the conflict. Tokyo emphasized the importance of working toward a final agreement and welcomed any step that helps defuse tensions in the region.

Indonesia:

Indonesia’s Foreign Ministry welcomed the truce and called on all parties to respect national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Jakarta underlined the need for diplomatic engagement and peaceful dialogue to prevent further escalation.

Oman:

Oman welcomed the ceasefire and expressed appreciation for the diplomatic efforts, including Pakistan’s role. Its foreign ministry stressed that the pause in fighting should pave the way toward a permanent cessation of hostilities and lasting peace in the region.

Australia:

Australia’s leaders publicly supported the ceasefire, saying it was a necessary step to ease the conflict’s impact on global energy markets and reduce human costs. Canberra thanked mediators from various countries and emphasized the importance of upholding the truce and achieving a resolution to the broader conflict.

Egypt:

Egypt’s foreign ministry welcomed the ceasefire and highlighted the importance of diplomacy and negotiations. Cairo encouraged parties to build on the truce to stop military operations fully and protect international navigation in the region.

Iraq:

Iraq’s government expressed hope that the ceasefire would reduce tensions and improve stability. Baghdad urged full commitment to the truce and called for continued dialogue and diplomatic engagement rather than renewed violence.

Malaysia:

Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the ceasefire as a “significant development [and] serves as a crucial step towards de-escalating tensions and restoring much-needed peace and stability” in the Middle East. The ministry urged “all parties to fully respect and implement all terms of the ceasefire in good faith” and avoid “provocative actions or unilateral measures” that could harm regional stability or global energy security.

New Zealand:

Foreign Minister Winston Peters welcomed the truce but stressed that “much more needed to be done” to secure a lasting ceasefire. He noted that the war has caused “wide-ranging impacts and disruptions” across the Middle East and beyond, and further diplomatic efforts are required.

Germany:

Chancellor Friedrich Merz hailed the ceasefire and thanked Pakistan for mediating. He emphasized that the next goal is to negotiate a “lasting end to war” through diplomacy.

Ukraine:

Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha welcomed the ceasefire and the unblocking of the Strait of Hormuz, calling for similar “decisiveness” by the US in addressing Russia’s war against Ukraine. He highlighted the effectiveness of American decisiveness in enforcing peace.

United Nations:

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called on all parties to honor the ceasefire to pave the way for a “lasting and comprehensive peace in the region.” He stressed the urgency of ending hostilities to protect civilian lives and alleviate human suffering, and thanked Pakistan and other nations for facilitating the truce.

India

India has welcomed the two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran, and reiterated that de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy are essential to bring an early end to the conflict. “The conflict has already caused immense suffering to people and disrupted global energy supply and trade networks. We expect that unimpeded freedom of navigation and global flow of commerce would prevail through the Strait of Hormuz,” India’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

Iran’s Position

While many countries welcomed the ceasefire, Tehran’s stance as reported recently shows continued insistence on a broader peace deal rather than temporary pauses, requiring guarantees and structural changes before a lasting peace can be reached—highlighting persistent complexity in negotiations.

Other UN and Regional Voices (Indirectly Reported):

Across Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, governments and international organizations welcomed the ceasefire as a chance to de‑escalate violence and urged all parties to remain committed to negotiations and broader peace efforts.